 |
MAYA PROJECT RESEARCH
|

|
Despite its name, the Bat Falcon
(Falco
rufigularis) eats mainly
small birds and large insects
such as
dragonflies.
|
Description and Results
The following account of our
research activities follows the outline just given. For each
topic, we describe the associated conservation challenges, give
some background knowledge on the topic, describe our research
activities, and give a brief synopsis of our results.
3. Toward the Documentation of a Tropical Forest Food Web
The study of the structure and function of food webs is in
part a rather esoteric branch of the field of theoretical
ecology. However, food web structure and function are also
important topics in applied conservation biology. Although the
functional role of predators in ecosystems is far from fully
understood, there is little doubt that predators of various
sorts play key roles in producing what we regard as normal
community structure and function.
|

|
The Laughing Falcon
(Herpetotheres cachinnans)
is a
snake-eating specialist.
|
Changes in the abundance of different predators have been
shown or suspected to lead to various sorts of ecological
imbalances. For example, in the absence of large predators,
smaller predators have been found in some cases to increase in
number--a phenomenon sometimes termed "mesopredator
release." In turn, the proliferation of small and
medium-sized, generalist predators is believed to have resulted
in increased rates of bird nest predation, both in fragmented,
suburban habitats in the U.S. (Wilcove 1985) and in tropical
habitats isolated by human activities (Loiselle and Hoppes
1983). In tropical forests, there is some evidence that the
disappearance of large predators from isolated forest tracts may
reverberate through the community, resulting even in changes in
the species composition of the tree community (Terborgh 1992,
Terborgh and Wright 1994).
We consider it very likely that food web structure and
function undergo dramatic changes as landscapes are subjected to
progressive deforestation and habitat fragmentation. We predict
that food web structure in isolated forest fragments is related
to factors such as fragment size and degree of isolation (i.e.,
whether organisms move freely through the surrounding habitat
matrix), and may differ radically from that observed in
continuous forest. However, we are a long way from knowing
whether this prediction will prove true; little is yet known of
food webs in areas of continuous forest, and even less is known
of food webs in habitat fragments.
|

|
Several Neotropical raptors
include many reptiles in their
diets, even the venomous
fer-de-lance (Bothrops asper).
|
Probably the most complete documentation of the food web of a
tropical forest to date is that of Reagan and Waide (1996) for
the Luquillo Experimental Forest in Puerto Rico. However, even
in their detailed study, the diet of birds is reported in quite
general terms, and only five species of raptorial birds occur in
this much-simplified island avifauna. Even the best-studied
Neotropical mainland sites--La Selva and Monteverde, Costa Rica;
Barro Colorado Island, Panama; and Manu, Peru--have not been the
site of thorough analyses of food webs among the vertebrates,
although a long-term study of diets of predatory vertebrates is
under way at La Selva (Greene
1988). A recent paper (Poulin et
al. 2001) makes an interesting contribution, documenting the
degree to which many primarily insectivorous, non-raptorial
birds in Panamanian forest included small lizards and frogs in
their diet.
|

|
Ornate Hawk-Eagles and Collared
Forest-Falcons
(Micrastur
semitorquatus) included
many
Keel-billed Toucans
(Ramphastos
sulfuratus) in their diets.
|
For no tropical raptor community has a thorough analysis of
community-wide diets been achieved. To date, the closest thing
to such a study is that of Robinson
(1994), in which he
describes habitat use, hunting behavior, and diet of the raptors
of Manu National Park, Peru. Voous (1969) provides a somewhat
similar overview of raptor diets in Surinam.
At Tikal we collected dietary data for 20 raptor species,
totaling more than 7,000 prey items identified at least to the
level of Class. Sample sizes were as follows:
Number of Diet Items Documented for Raptor Species at Tikal
| Study species
|
Diet items documented
(identified at
least to Class)
|
| Swallow-tailed Kite (Elanoides forficatus)
|
1,496
|
| Double-toothed Kite (Harpagus bidentatus)
|
550
|
| Plumbeous Kite (Ictinia plumbea)
|
655
|
| Hook-billed Kite (Chondrohierax uncinatus)
|
67
|
| Bicolored Hawk (Accipiter bicolor)
|
218
|
| Crane Hawk (Geranospiza caerulescens) |
181 |
| White Hawk (Leucopternis albicollis)
|
210
|
| Great Black-Hawk (Buteogallus urubitinga)
|
130
|
| Roadside Hawk (Buteo magnirostris) |
192 |
| Crested Eagle (Morphnus guianensis) |
100
|
|
Black Hawk-Eagle (Spizaetus tyrannus)
|
85
|
|
Ornate Hawk-Eagle (Spizaetus ornatus)
|
325 |
| Barred Forest-Falcon (Micrastur ruficollis)
|
405 |
| Collared Forest-Falcon (Micrastur semitorquatus)
|
206 |
| Laughing Falcon (Herpetotheres cachinnans) |
747 |
|
Bat Falcon (Falco rufigularis)
|
1.405 |
| Orange-breasted Falcon (Falco deiroleucus) |
105 |
|
Mottled Owl (Strix virgata)
|
61 |
| Black-and-White Owl (Strix nigrolineata)
|
73 |
| ________________________________________ |
_______________________ |
| Total |
7,211 |
| Average per study species |
379 + 428 (SD; n =
19)
|
| Median per study species
|
206 |
Our analyses of these data from the standpoint of the raptor
community's ecology are still underway. Without a doubt, these
data will provide the most detailed portrait to date of the diet
of a tropical forest raptor community.
Literature Cited, Toward the Documentation of a Tropical Forest Food Web
NEXT

18
|
 |